not represent examples of dialogue in the formal sense because the audience response is offered only hypothetically in the disputation framed by the prophet himself.4 E. Pfeiffer (p. 568) has correctly observed that Malachi represents a later development of the disputation speech form, in fact, the final expression of the form according to Westermann (1964: 125–26). Perhaps better suited to the study of Malachi is March’s more generic understanding of the disputation as essentially “the answering
Page 37